RTI Activist » Blog Archive » RTI Activist’s Question To Anna Hazare : Why Is This Anti-Corruption GR Kept Secret From Your Followers ?
Home » Featured, News, RTI Activist

RTI Activist’s Question To Anna Hazare : Why Is This Anti-Corruption GR Kept Secret From Your Followers ?

30 September 2011 No Comment

RTI Activist Krishnaraj Rao Questions, why don’t we use effective mechanisms to curb corruption which are present before agitating for new ones.Below are few Government Resolutions which can be used to fight against Corrupt & Corruption.

MARATHI Maharashtra Govt. Circular No. AHAT1610/CR 64/10/11-A: http://tinyurl.com/Maha-Anti-Corrupt-GR

ENGLISH TRANSLATION: http://tinyurl.com/Maha-Anti-Corrupt-GR-English
[The yellow highlighted parts are notes for your understanding.]

How to use this GR? DETAILED INSTRUCTIONS: http://tinyurl.com/Bhrashtrachar-Committee-Guide

Sadly, this anti-corruption mechanism is underused.  Will you please train your followers (including India Against Corruption) to use this in a widespread manner?


1) CAN PUNISH THE SMALLEST GOVT. SERVANT TO IAS / IPS OFFICER. This GR makes no exceptions for anybody. Corruption, undue delays and dereliction of duty will be punished, no matter who commits it. It confers sweeping powers on the common man, who can submit written complaints as well as oral submissions before the Corruption Eradication Committees.

2)    SPREADS ANTI-CORRUPTION MECHANISM THROUGHOUT MAHARASHTRA. This GR mandates the establishment of Committees and Vigilance Squads for Eradication of corruption at Divisional, District and Taluka levels. It sets up a multi-layered Corruption Control-cum-Grievance Redressal mechanism that is geographically dispersed in rural and urban Maharashtra, and spread over different levels of the State administration — from the Taluka level up to Mantralaya.

3)    CONSOLIDATES MANY ANTI-CORRUPTION & ANTI-DELAY GRS. This GR consolidates ten anti-corruption and delay prevention government circulars (GRs) issued between 1996 and 2009. Those 10 old GRs are now cancelled, having been given effect in this one single GR.

4)    USER-FRIENDLY. It establishes a mechanism for ACCEPTING WRITTEN COMPLAINTS AND HEARING ORAL SUBMISSIONS at places that are reasonably close to accessible for the common man i.e. Taluka headquarters, District headquarters and Divisional headquarters. Also, it is supposed to hear not only allegations of corruption, but ALSO THOSE CONCERNING UNDUE DELAY, IRREGULARITIES, FAVOURITISM etc.

5)    NOT TOP-HEAVY; SPREADS ONUS FOR ACTION THROUGHOUT THE ADMINISTRATION. It spreads out authority on several ex-officio heads of department such as Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Superintendent of Police Anti-Corruption Bureau and Chief Engineer PWD. THESE PEOPLE BRING DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE OF THE SPECIFIC FIELD CONCERNING THE COMPLAINT. THEY UNDERSTAND THE GROUND REALITIES, AND, UNLIKE JUDGES SITTING IN HIGH COURTS, VIGILANCE COMMISSIONS OR LOKAYUKTA’S OFFICES, THEY CAN GO TO THE SPOT. It also introduces 5 to 10 CIVIL SOCIETY WATCHDOG MEMBERS in each committee. Thus, it is not top-heavy. (One badly-selected Information Commissioner can jam up the RTI system for five years because he has no pressure to perform. But one badly-selected member of Corruption Eradication Committee cannot do the same, because this GR puts pressure on him to perform, like a gun to his head! IF HE FAILS TO ACT IN 90 DAYS, THE COMPLAINANT CAN ESCALATE THE MATTER TO THE NEXT LEVEL, AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS WILL BE RECOMMENDED AGAINST THE DELAYING MEMBER OF THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMITTEE OR VIGILANCE SQUAD!)

6)    INFORMATION RECEIVED UNDER RTI, OR FROM WHISTLEBLOWERS. Specific mention of Right to Information is made in point no. 7.  However, it also gives SCOPE FOR ADMINISTRATION INSIDERS TO BLOW THE WHISTLE on negligent or corrupt superiors and colleagues.

7)    ENDS IN DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY & DISCIPLINARY ACTION. Wherever guilt is established – not only for corruption, but even for undue delay and other kinds of breach of Maharashtra Civil Service Rules — the case lands in the lap of the Competent Authority for that particular officer. This is the government authority empowered to hold departmental enquiries and initiate disciplinary action. Thus, the punishment (unlike an RTI penalty) will have a lasting impact on the career of officers found guilty.

8)    AMPLE INTERNAL CHECKS & BALANCES. The GR puts the onus of investigation and evidence-collection on VIGILANCE SQUADS, which consists of A group and B group officers at each district level. These officers are supposed to work under the supervision of the concerned Corruption Eradication Committee. If Vigilance Squad members don’t function properly, or if they become corrupt or drag their feet on some cases, etc., the GR defines 90-day deadlines for investigation and reporting. If deadlines are crossed, the complaint can automatically get escalated to the next higher level, making the corrupt squad members, and also corrupt committee members, eligible for departmental enquiry and disciplinary action.

9)    GIVES TEETH TO ALL EXISTING RULES & LAWS (STATE & CENTRAL), AND THEREBY GIVES TEETH TO THE COMMON MAN. Maharashtra’s Prevention of Delay in Discharge of Official Duties Act [http://tinyurl.com/Maha-Delay-Prevention-Act ] is specifically mentioned in the GR. So is the Maharashtra Civil Services Rules 1979 (Amended 2008) http://tinyurl.com/MahaCivilServicesRules . However, there are many other rules, laws and guidelines  –  too numerous to name here. This GR gives the citizen power to invoke any of these while making a complaint and oral submission!

10)    INCLUDES FEEDBACK MECHANISM FOR COMPLAINANT. This GR has provisions that make it necessary for the Committee or Squad to get back to the complainant with its findings and reports – whether guilty or not-guilty.

11)    NO TIME LIMITS! People, bring out your old RTI documents showing corruption, undue delays, irregularities, frauds etc. This GR says that the Committees and Squads must entertain them, even if one or two years have passed. Because no time-limits are specified for your complaint.

Annaji, while agitating for more effective mechanisms, it is crucial to start using the ones that we already have. Don’t you agree?

Comments are closed.